[ A Nation Divided | Main Index | Civil War Reference Books ]
Causes of the Civil War
[ Underlying Factors | Events leading to war ]
It is evident that the most fundamental cause of the Civil War was slavery. It was the sine qua non of the war. If slavery had previously been abolished in this country, it is likely that the Civil War would not have happened; with slavery in existence in part, but not all, of the United States, there was a significant chance that a Civil War would eventually have happened even if the events in the years before 1861 had taken a different course.
That being said, there were many other causes of the Civil War; factors which led to this conflict. In this brief consideration of the topic, we will look at both the underlying factors and the particular events which combined in the nineteenth century and resulted in the Civil War.
A number of the underlying factors which help lead to the Civil War in the United States had their genesis in the nature of the country's creation, that is, in its founding documents. While there was considerable sentiment by the founders to prohibit slavery in the Constitution, this was not done, and so this issue was allowed to fester and eventually cause enough friction to set the conflagration going.
Slavery was a political, economic, social and moral issue which strongly divided the citizens of the nation. Because of differences in history and economies, slavery was also a sectional issue between the North and South. Whether rights of slave owners would be protected throughout the country, whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories, whether slavery was to be abolished in the South, and whether slavery was a moral evil were all questions which generated diametrically opposed answers in the North and South.
There was another divisive issue which, though addressed in the Constitution, was not there resolved and which added to the conflicting forces leading to the war, viz. the debate between Federal power and States' rights. Through much of the nineteenth century, the Federal government had been gaining more power at the expense of the States. While not so directly relevant to geography, this too became a sectional conflict. The resentment and fear of growing Federal power by those in the South was an important factor in their decision to try to secede from Union.
It is interesting to note that both the North and South claimed the heritage of the American Revolution for their own side. Those in the North pointed to the principals of liberty and equality for all men, along with the principal of the permanent union of the states which Washington so clearly backed. Those in the South countered with the principals of individual rights against governments, the freedoms of individuals in an agrarian society, and the rights of the sovereign states as enshrined in the Constitution.
Besides political causes, the differences in culture and economy between the North and South also influenced the events of the mid-nineteenth century. The North had become industrialized and urban, and there was a general support for the government being intimately involved in the nation's economy and life. The South was essentially agricultural and rural, with a strong streak of suspicion about the federal government. In the North, there was a need for free labor and the different social classes had to learn to work together. In the South, the plantation economy relied heavily on slave labor and the social distinctions were rigidly maintained.
Events leading to war
Missouri Compromise of 1820
By 1820, the tensions between the "free" and "slave" states was already apparent, with the South concerned that the admission of new free states would lead to the political power of the slave states being overwhelmed. The compromise of 1820 allowed the admission of Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state, helping to maintain the balance of power. At the same time, the 36º 30' parallel of latitude was established as the division between any new slave and free states.
One of the strongest supporters of the compromise, was "the Great Compromiser" himself, Henry Clay, who had fought so hard for the Missouri Compromise 30 years before. 73 years old in 1850, Clay fought hard for this new compromise. The print above shows Clay making his last great speech to the Senate in favor of the compromise (Clay died just two years later). Clay was wrong in his hopes, however. Instead, the Compromise of 1850 further inflamed the passions of those in the North, who were unhappy about the allowance of slavery above the 36º 30' parallel of latitude and the fugitive slave act. Instead of dampening the fires of division, this compromise added fuel to the embers.
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854
The Kansas-Nebraska established these two territories out of what had been a single, unorganized territory comprising the lands north of the Indian territories, west of the Missouri River and east of the Rockies. The South was unified in its abhorrence of the idea of allowing a free state to be created just to the west of Missouri, so a compromise was reached which allowed these new territories to be established under the principal of "popular sovereignty." This effectively voided the Missouri Compromise, which prohibited the introduction of slavery that far north, and it further infuriated those in the North.
This act radically influenced the political situation in the country, changing the character and popularity of the existing political parties and leading to the formation of the Republican party, which was established in part to fight against the expansion of slavery into any new territories or states. The act also led to a further increase in the level of passion over the slavery issue, both in words and deeds.
For more information call, write, fax or e-mail to:
8441 Germantown Avenue
Philadelphia, PA 19118
(215) 242-4750 [Phone]
(215) 242-6977 [Fax]
©The Philadelphia Print Shop, Ltd. 2015